Voice
in the Crowd
By
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






Death and Taxes

Seems like most Americans now feel that only half of that old adage is true.  Death is certain.  But they think we can get along without taxes.  It’s natural that no one wants to pay any tax.  It would be so nice to have government provide for all our needs without having to pay taxes.  But it just won’t work that way.  Someone has to pay the bill.

Constitutional purists will say the income tax is illegal, that the only permissible tax on the American people is the ad valorem tax, added to the value of a product.  Indeed, earlier dictionaries defined income as profit.  Later the definition came to be wages.  Regardless, we have had income taxes for a while and they aren’t going away as much as some would like them to.

In Washington, the crusade is on to lower taxes.  The last tax cut put some $600 in the average pocket with the only effect being an increased deficit.  More reductions seem to be on the way.  Obviously, the deficit will increase.  More immediately will be the cut in funding that flows for programs from Washington down to the states.  When this cash stream is cut at capitols around the country, state governments cut back on funds coming down to cities and counties.  That leaves local government to trim back on the services citizens demand—schools, sanitation, infrastructure, improvements.  Either they do that, or they increase the taxes they control with additional sales taxes and property taxes, to name a couple of avenues.

In the last gubernatorial campaign in Tennessee, it was a classic abuse of campaign rhetoric.  GOP candidate Van Hilleary, in the primary and the general election, waved the banner of No Income Tax so vigorously that it became a contest as to which candidate hated the income tax most.  Democratic candidate Phil Bredesen had to “hate income taxes” too.  In the Republican primary, Jim Henry declared his opposition to any income tax, but suggested the question of taxes and expenditures be put in the hands of the people.  His idea was to go to the people and let them make the decision.

The Hilleary camp won the primary by putting on TV and through a mailout of a fake document supposedly showing Jim Henry’s signature on a pro income tax paper.  Actually, it was his signature on a paper helping then Gov. Ned McWherter study school funding.  It had nothing to do with proposing an income tax.  The chicanery won the primary, but cost Van Hilleary the general election against Democrat Bredesen.

This put Gov. Bredesen in the position of having to balance a shaky budget on the proverbial shoestring.  As the war with Iraq loomed, tax cuts were passed and Washington began drying up state funding, Tennessee’s governor joined executives across the country in performing the unpleasant task of cutting services.

Unlike the federal government, states must operate within the boundaries of their income.  Washington doesn’t break a dollar bill’s sweat to go a few trillion dollars in debt.  One of our senators once said, a billion here and a billion there pretty soon amounts to big money.  Now it’s a trillion here and a trillion there.

The people of Tennessee had faith in those elected to the state’s legislative and executive branches.  Those in office should have the same respect for the people.  Put the situation on the table with the options.  Cut services.  More sales tax.  More property tax.  Income tax.  Let the people decide.  Whether we like it or not, taxes are just as certain as death.